It is well-documented that Cleopatra was of Macedonian descent. Her family left Europe and landed in Egypt, where they became kings.
When Cleopatra was born, her family had been ruling Egypt for 300 years.
So that prompts the question: did Cleopatra only have Macedonian blood? Or did her ancestors marry people of other nationalities during their 300-year stay in Africa?
To answer that, here is a fast-ish breakdown of Cleopatra’s ethnicity.
Background: the decline and invasion of Egypt
The native Egyptian pharaohs built the impressive pyramids 2,500 (!!) years before Cleopatra was born. By the time of her birth, Egypt was in decline and ruled by foreigners. (Photo: Vincent Brown/CCBY2.0)
When Cleopatra was born in the 1st. century BC, Egypt was in decline.
The country had had an impressive run; it had been a superpower for millennia. The native Egyptian pharaohs had built amazing cities, pyramids, and temples. But that took place 2,500 years before Cleopatra’s birth.
By the 900s BC, Egypt had lost its power. So it was invaded by the neighboring Libyans.
Why was Cleopatra Macedonian?
Cleopatra’s family: the Ptolemies. They were highly inbred. The Ptolemy kings married their full-sisters.
Why was Cleopatra Macedonian? Well, all the roads lead to Alexander the Great.
Alexander was the king of Macedon, a smallish country in Europe.
Alexander crossed into Asia and conquered the huge Persian Empire, which included Egypt. That happened in the 320s BC.
Alexander became pharaoh of Egypt, but he soon died.
His generals split the empire between them and made themselves kings of those lands.
The Ptolemaic dynasty begins
One of Alexander’s generals was Ptolemy Lagos. In the partition of the empire, Ptolemy grabbed Egypt.
He made himself pharaoh and established the Ptolemaic dynasty, which bears his name. His descendants ruled Egypt for the next 300 years.
Ptolemy was the direct ancestor of “our” Cleopatra.
Back in Macedonia, Ptolemy had been a nobleman. But now that he was king, he wanted his kids to have royal blood. So he tried to marry Alexander the Great’s sister. But she was killed by his enemies. Coincidentally, her name was Cleopatra, which was a popular Macedonian name, not an Egyptian one.
Since that engagement failed, Ptolemy decided that a Macedonian noblewoman would have to do. He married two (not at the same time, though).
So Ptolemy’s children were of full Macedonian blood despite being born in Egypt.
After Ptolemy died, his son Ptolemy II became king. He first married a Greek/Macedonian noblewoman. And then, he married his full-sister, following an ancient Egyptian custom.
So Ptolemy II’s children were also Macedonians.
And most of the other Ptolemy kings followed suit: they married their sisters. That went on for 300 years until Cleopatra was born in this highly inbred family.
That is why Cleopatra had Macedonian blood.
But were the Ptolemies only Macedonian?
Cleopatra’s Ptolemies married outside the family only four times. The brides were related to one another. They all descended from Alexander the Great’s generals.
No, the Ptolemies were not only Greek and Macedonian.
Cleopatra’s ancestors did marry four times outside of the family. Each time, they chose brides that descended from Alexander the Great’s generals.
These four women -Berenice I, Arsinoe I, Berenice II, Cleopatra I- were heavily related to one another. And three of them were relatives of the Ptolemies themselves.
The four brides were of Macedonian descent. Two of them were fully Greek/Macedonian. While the other two also had Persian (Middle Eastern) blood.
Through them, Cleopatra’s family tree gets quite impressive. She descends from Seleucus, Lysimachus, Antigonus, and Antipater. They were Alexander the Great’s Macedonian generals, just like Ptolemy.
And just like Ptolemy, they became kings after Alexander’s death.
Therefore, Cleopatra was related to many of the ruling houses of the Mediterranean. For example, the famous King Mithridates the Great of Pontus was a relation of hers. Mithridates was one of Rome’s greatest enemies for decades.
So the Ptolemies had Macedonian and Persian blood. Or Greek and Iranian, to use their modern equivalents.
- Read about her ancestors in more detail: These are Cleopatra’s Dazzling Ancestors. Her Family Tree
Macedonian, Persian, and…?
Here it gets interesting. The Ptolemies were reigning royals. So there are clear records of who married whom and which children they had.
It is certain that Cleopatra’s grandfather, King Ptolemy IX, was of full Greek and Iranian descent. All his ancestors are neatly accounted for.
But then, the clarity ends. There are two blank spaces in Cleopatra’s family tree.
First blank: Cleopatra’s grandmother
Cleopatra’s father, King Ptolemy XII, was nicknamed ‘Auletes’ (flute-player) and ‘Nothos’ (bastard). He was the son of the king. But who was his mother?
Cleopatra’s grandfather, King Ptolemy IX, dutifully married his two sisters.
Yet his son, Ptolemy XII Auletes, was probably not the offspring of either of them.
At least there is no record that he was. And Egyptians and Romans called him ‘Nothos,’ a word that means ‘bastard’ in Greek.
Auletes may have been the son of a concubine.
The Ptolemies had a strong love for everything Greek. Their court was full of Greeks and Macedonians. Their capital, Alexandria, had been founded by Greeks and was full of Greeks. The Ptolemies’ native language was Greek, which was also the tongue spoken at court and in which the official documents were written. And they received Greek educations. The Ptolemies were quite proud of their Greek descent, and they held tight to their culture.
The situation in Egypt was loosely akin to what happened when the British conquered India and displaced the native population.
So, usually, the concubines of the Ptolemies were Greeks. Likely, the concubine of Ptolemy IX was also a Greek. But there is no proof of it. And someone else could have caught the eye of the king.
The Ptolemies were in contact with peoples from Europe, the Middle East, Lybia and Numidia (both in North Africa), Kush and other sub-Saharan territories, and certainly with native Egyptians. So his concubine could have hailed from any of these lands.
Thus, his son Ptolemy Auletes could have been of mixed blood.
Some scholars have argued that Auletes was not truly illegitimate, that he was the son of Ptolemy IX’s second wife, who was a Ptolemy. But when she married her kingly brother, she, oddly, did not become the official queen of Egypt. That would have accounted for her son being called ‘illegitimate,’ as in not the son of the official queen.
Neither the Egyptians nor the Romans liked Auletes, so it is possible that they used his mother’s unofficial status to denigrate him.
But at this point, there is no evidence one way or the other.
If it comes down to probability, most likely, Cleopatra’s grandmother was a concubine of unknown nationality.
Second blank? Cleopatra’s mother
Now, this is a big unknown since it represents 50% of Cleopatra’s ethnic makeup.
There are no records of who was Cleopatra’s mother.
King Ptolemy Auletes married, of course, his sister. Her name was Cleopatra V Tryphaena.
And the king had several children. But soon after the birth of his daughter Cleopatra VII -our Cleopatra-, Trypahena almost completely disappears from the official documents.
Some think she died during childbirth or soon after Cleopatra’s birth.
But there are two historical mentions of Tryphaena later on. One, 11 years later, in a dedication on a temple. And a few years later, there was a Tryphaena that ruled Egypt briefly with Cleopatra’s sister.
So other scholars believe Auletes and his wife had a falling out soon after Cleopatra’s birth. And that he exiled Tryphaena. That would explain her disappearance from the documents. It would also explain why she is not mentioned as the mother of Cleopatra, and why there is so little information about her in general.
So if that is what happened, it is not surprising that everything related to Auletes’ wife is missing. He would have erased her from the records.
The problem is that it leaves a blank when it comes to the famous Cleopatra VII. Are there no records of who was her mother because she was the daughter of a concubine? Or was she the queen’s daughter, and the association was erased?
One ancient Greek author, Strabo, mentions Auletes’ five children. He says that his eldest daughter Berenice, who was legitimate, became queen.
Is Strabo saying that Auletes’ other children, including Cleopatra, were illegitimate? Or is he just pointing out that Queen Berenice was legitimate, unlike her illegitimate father? (Spell it out, Strabo!)
No Roman author, of the many that wrote about Cleopatra, mentions that she was illegitimate. This might be telling since the Romans ended up being quite entangled with Cleopatra, and most of them did not like her one bit. After all, if it had been up to the queen, Rome would have been a province of Egypt.
And let’s remember Romans had no problem calling someone a bastard to their face, as they did with Cleopatra’s father.
Yet, not even Cicero calls her a bastard. The famous orator liked calling people names and pointing out their flaws. And he disliked the queen, whom he had met. He does write about her disparagingly, but does not mention she is illegitimate.
Most surprisingly, not even Octavian does.
Octavian was Cleopatra’s archenemy. He had mounted a full-fledged PR campaign in Rome against the queen and her Roman husband, Mark Antony.
Octavian used every possible charge against them -real, exaggerated, or imaginary. And yet, he does not call Cleopatra illegitimate once.
In Auletes’ case, most scholars believe he was the son of a concubine. In Cleopatra’s case, most scholars suspect she was the daughter of Tryphaena, the queen.
If Tryphaena was Cleopatra’s mother, she would have passed to her daughter more Macedonian and Persian genes.
Summary: Cleopatra’s ethnic makeup
Cleopatra imagined by six European painters.
So only 25% of Cleopatra’s ethnic makeup is absolutely certain: through her grandfather, Cleopatra was 25% European and Middle Eastern.
The other 75% is inconclusive. It could have been European, Middle Eastern, North African, sub-Saharan African, or a mix of two or more of those.
To simplify: Cleopatra could have been 100% Caucasian, or she could have been mixed (Caucasian+African).
If the archaeologists make a breakthrough, and that 75% is solved, we’ll let you know.
More on Cleopatra and Julius Caesar: